Babyfood, tropical fruit medley vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Babyfood, tropical fruit medley
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Babyfood, tropical fruit medley | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 46 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 49% more |
| Protein | 0.31 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 85% more |
| Carbs | 12.22 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 41% more |
| Fat | 0.14 g ★ | 0.15 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 7% more |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 61% more |
| Sugar | 9.78 g | 6.48 g ★ | Babyfood, tropical fruit medley has 51% more |
| Sodium | 0 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Calcium | 0 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Iron | 0 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Vitamin C | 15.9 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 19% more |
| Potassium | 141 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 70% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.