Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw
3 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
4 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 165 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw has 8% more |
| Protein | 20.64 g | 24.58 g ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 16% more |
| Fat | 8.55 g | 5.28 g ★ | Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw has 62% more |
| Sodium | 52 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 42% more |
| Calcium | 25 mg ★ | 8 mg | Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw has 213% more |
| Iron | 1.49 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw has 231% more |
| Potassium | 317 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 28% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.