Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, roasted vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, roasted
4 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
3 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, roasted | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 221 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, roasted has 44% more |
| Protein | 25.66 g ★ | 24.58 g | Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, roasted has 4% more |
| Fat | 12.36 g | 5.28 g ★ | Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, roasted has 134% more |
| Sodium | 50 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 44% more |
| Calcium | 17 mg ★ | 8 mg | Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, roasted has 113% more |
| Iron | 1.7 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, roasted has 278% more |
| Potassium | 308 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 30% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.