Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw
4 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
3 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 174 kcal | 165 kcal ★ | Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 5% more |
| Protein | 20.64 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 33% more |
| Fat | 9.51 g | 3.57 g ★ | Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 166% more |
| Sodium | 51 mg ★ | 74 mg | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 31% more |
| Calcium | 25 mg ★ | 15 mg | Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 67% more |
| Iron | 1.47 mg ★ | 1.04 mg | Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 41% more |
| Potassium | 313 mg ★ | 256 mg | Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 22% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.