Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, roasted vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, roasted
4 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
3 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, roasted | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 201 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, roasted has 31% more |
| Protein | 26.44 g ★ | 24.58 g | Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, roasted has 8% more |
| Fat | 9.78 g | 5.28 g ★ | Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, roasted has 85% more |
| Sodium | 56 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 38% more |
| Calcium | 21 mg ★ | 8 mg | Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, roasted has 163% more |
| Iron | 1.62 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, roasted has 260% more |
| Potassium | 338 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 23% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.