Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, roasted vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, roasted
4 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
3 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, roasted | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 193 kcal | 165 kcal ★ | Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, roasted has 17% more |
| Protein | 26.34 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 15% more |
| Fat | 9.73 g | 3.57 g ★ | Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, roasted has 173% more |
| Sodium | 54 mg ★ | 74 mg | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 27% more |
| Calcium | 15 mg ★ | 15 mg | Equal |
| Iron | 1.77 mg ★ | 1.04 mg | Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, roasted has 70% more |
| Potassium | 324 mg ★ | 256 mg | Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, roasted has 27% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.