Fish, cusk, raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, cusk, raw
5 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
5 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, cusk, raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 87 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 28% more |
| Protein | 18.99 g ★ | 4.4 g | Fish, cusk, raw has 332% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 0.69 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 64% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 31 mg | 7 mg ★ | Fish, cusk, raw has 343% more |
| Calcium | 10 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 41% more |
| Iron | 0.83 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 44% more |
| Potassium | 392 mg ★ | 172 mg | Fish, cusk, raw has 128% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.