Fish, cusk, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, cusk, raw
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, cusk, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 87 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 3% more |
| Protein | 18.99 g ★ | 2.01 g | Fish, cusk, raw has 845% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 0.69 g | 0.15 g ★ | Fish, cusk, raw has 360% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 31 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 14% more |
| Calcium | 10 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 74% more |
| Iron | 0.83 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Fish, cusk, raw has 20% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 392 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 17% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.