Huckleberries, raw (Alaska Native) vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Huckleberries, raw (Alaska Native)
4 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
7 wins
| Nutrient | Huckleberries, raw (Alaska Native) | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 37 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 69% more |
| Protein | 0.4 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 91% more |
| Carbs | 8.7 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 59% more |
| Fat | 0.1 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 95% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 10 mg | 7 mg ★ | Huckleberries, raw (Alaska Native) has 43% more |
| Calcium | 15 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 12% more |
| Iron | 0.3 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 80% more |
| Vitamin C | 2.8 mg ★ | 0 mg | Huckleberries, raw (Alaska Native) has 0% more |
| Potassium | 0 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.