Infant formula, ABBOTT NUTRITION, SIMILAC, ISOMIL, with iron, ready-to-feed vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Infant formula, ABBOTT NUTRITION, SIMILAC, ISOMIL, with iron, ready-to-feed
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
Nutrient Infant formula, ABBOTT NUTRITION, SIMILAC, ISOMIL, with iron, ready-to-feed Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt Difference
Calories 66 kcal 90 kcal Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 27% more
Protein 1.61 g 2.01 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 20% more
Carbs 6.7 g 20.71 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 68% more
Fat 3.59 g 0.15 g Infant formula, ABBOTT NUTRITION, SIMILAC, ISOMIL, with iron, ready-to-feed has 2293% more
Fiber 0 g 3.3 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Sugar 6.7 g 6.48 g Infant formula, ABBOTT NUTRITION, SIMILAC, ISOMIL, with iron, ready-to-feed has 3% more
Sodium 29 mg 36 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 19% more
Calcium 69 mg 38 mg Infant formula, ABBOTT NUTRITION, SIMILAC, ISOMIL, with iron, ready-to-feed has 82% more
Iron 1.18 mg 0.69 mg Infant formula, ABBOTT NUTRITION, SIMILAC, ISOMIL, with iron, ready-to-feed has 71% more
Vitamin C 5.9 mg 19.6 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 70% more
Potassium 71 mg 475 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 85% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.