Pillsbury, Cinnamon Rolls with Icing, refrigerated dough vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Pillsbury, Cinnamon Rolls with Icing, refrigerated dough
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Pillsbury, Cinnamon Rolls with Icing, refrigerated dough | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 330 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Pillsbury, Cinnamon Rolls with Icing, refrigerated dough has 267% more |
| Protein | 4.34 g ★ | 2.01 g | Pillsbury, Cinnamon Rolls with Icing, refrigerated dough has 116% more |
| Carbs | 53.42 g ★ | 20.71 g | Pillsbury, Cinnamon Rolls with Icing, refrigerated dough has 158% more |
| Fat | 11.27 g | 0.15 g ★ | Pillsbury, Cinnamon Rolls with Icing, refrigerated dough has 7413% more |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 58% more |
| Sugar | 21.34 g | 6.48 g ★ | Pillsbury, Cinnamon Rolls with Icing, refrigerated dough has 229% more |
| Sodium | 780 mg | 36 mg ★ | Pillsbury, Cinnamon Rolls with Icing, refrigerated dough has 2067% more |
| Calcium | 28 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 26% more |
| Iron | 1.93 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Pillsbury, Cinnamon Rolls with Icing, refrigerated dough has 180% more |
| Vitamin C | 0.1 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 99% more |
| Potassium | 0 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.