Pork, bacon, rendered fat, cooked vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Pork, bacon, rendered fat, cooked
2 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
9 wins
| Nutrient | Pork, bacon, rendered fat, cooked | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 898 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Pork, bacon, rendered fat, cooked has 898% more |
| Protein | 0.07 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 97% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 99.5 g | 0.15 g ★ | Pork, bacon, rendered fat, cooked has 66233% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 27 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 25% more |
| Calcium | 1 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 97% more |
| Iron | 0.13 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 81% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 15 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 97% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.