Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw
4 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 174 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 45% more |
| Protein | 20.64 g ★ | 4.4 g | Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 369% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 9.51 g | 1.92 g ★ | Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 395% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 51 mg | 7 mg ★ | Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 629% more |
| Calcium | 25 mg ★ | 17 mg | Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 47% more |
| Iron | 1.47 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 1% more |
| Potassium | 313 mg ★ | 172 mg | Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 82% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.