Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw
5 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
5 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 154 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 28% more |
| Protein | 21.17 g ★ | 4.4 g | Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 381% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 7.06 g | 1.92 g ★ | Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 268% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 54 mg | 7 mg ★ | Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 671% more |
| Calcium | 27 mg ★ | 17 mg | Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 59% more |
| Iron | 1.54 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 3% more |
| Potassium | 323 mg ★ | 172 mg | Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 88% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.