Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw
5 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
5 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 129 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 8% more |
| Protein | 21.34 g ★ | 4.4 g | Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 385% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 4.21 g | 1.92 g ★ | Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 119% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 54 mg | 7 mg ★ | Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 671% more |
| Calcium | 22 mg ★ | 17 mg | Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 29% more |
| Iron | 1.55 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 4% more |
| Potassium | 344 mg ★ | 172 mg | Beef, bottom sirloin, tri-tip roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 100% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.