Beef, chuck, clod roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, roasted vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck, clod roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, roasted
3 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
4 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck, clod roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, roasted | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 196 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Beef, chuck, clod roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, roasted has 28% more |
| Protein | 27.3 g ★ | 24.58 g | Beef, chuck, clod roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, roasted has 11% more |
| Fat | 8.76 g | 5.28 g ★ | Beef, chuck, clod roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, roasted has 66% more |
| Sodium | 72 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 20% more |
| Calcium | 7 mg | 8 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 13% more |
| Iron | 3.09 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Beef, chuck, clod roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, roasted has 587% more |
| Potassium | 372 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 15% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.