Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw
5 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
2 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 131 kcal ★ | 153 kcal | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 14% more |
| Protein | 21.19 g | 24.58 g ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 14% more |
| Fat | 5.18 g ★ | 5.28 g | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 2% more |
| Sodium | 82 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 9% more |
| Calcium | 11 mg ★ | 8 mg | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 38% more |
| Iron | 2.5 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 456% more |
| Potassium | 347 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 21% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.