Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw
5 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
2 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 123 kcal ★ | 153 kcal | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 20% more |
| Protein | 21.3 g | 24.58 g ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 13% more |
| Fat | 4.17 g ★ | 5.28 g | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 21% more |
| Sodium | 81 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 10% more |
| Calcium | 11 mg ★ | 8 mg | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw has 38% more |
| Iron | 2.44 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw has 442% more |
| Potassium | 346 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 21% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.