Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, braised vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, braised
4 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
3 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, braised | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 197 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, braised has 29% more |
| Protein | 33.55 g ★ | 24.58 g | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, braised has 36% more |
| Fat | 6.94 g | 5.28 g ★ | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, braised has 31% more |
| Sodium | 67 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 26% more |
| Calcium | 15 mg ★ | 8 mg | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, braised has 88% more |
| Iron | 3.53 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, braised has 684% more |
| Potassium | 315 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 28% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.