Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, USDA select, cooked, broiled vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, USDA select, cooked, broiled
4 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
3 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, USDA select, cooked, broiled | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 159 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, USDA select, cooked, broiled has 4% more |
| Protein | 26.08 g ★ | 24.58 g | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, USDA select, cooked, broiled has 6% more |
| Fat | 5.24 g ★ | 5.28 g | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 1% more |
| Sodium | 68 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 24% more |
| Calcium | 7 mg | 8 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 13% more |
| Iron | 2.8 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, USDA select, cooked, broiled has 522% more |
| Potassium | 293 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 33% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.