Beef, chuck, short ribs, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck, short ribs, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw
3 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
4 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck, short ribs, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 240 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Beef, chuck, short ribs, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 57% more |
| Protein | 17.22 g | 24.58 g ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 30% more |
| Fat | 19.03 g | 5.28 g ★ | Beef, chuck, short ribs, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 260% more |
| Sodium | 75 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 17% more |
| Calcium | 11 mg ★ | 8 mg | Beef, chuck, short ribs, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 38% more |
| Iron | 2.3 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Beef, chuck, short ribs, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 411% more |
| Potassium | 282 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 36% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.