Beef, chuck, short ribs, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck, short ribs, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw
4 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
4 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck, short ribs, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 169 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Beef, chuck, short ribs, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw has 10% more |
| Protein | 19.68 g | 24.58 g ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 20% more |
| Carbs | 0.05 g ★ | 0 g | Beef, chuck, short ribs, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw has 0% more |
| Fat | 10.02 g | 5.28 g ★ | Beef, chuck, short ribs, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw has 90% more |
| Sodium | 85 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 6% more |
| Calcium | 12 mg ★ | 8 mg | Beef, chuck, short ribs, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw has 50% more |
| Iron | 2.45 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Beef, chuck, short ribs, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw has 444% more |
| Potassium | 307 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 30% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.