Beef, chuck, shoulder clod, shoulder tender, medallion, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck, shoulder clod, shoulder tender, medallion, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw
3 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
4 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck, shoulder clod, shoulder tender, medallion, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 144 kcal ★ | 153 kcal | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 6% more |
| Protein | 20.54 g | 24.58 g ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 16% more |
| Fat | 6.22 g | 5.28 g ★ | Beef, chuck, shoulder clod, shoulder tender, medallion, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw has 18% more |
| Sodium | 58 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 36% more |
| Calcium | 5 mg | 8 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 38% more |
| Iron | 1.95 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Beef, chuck, shoulder clod, shoulder tender, medallion, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw has 333% more |
| Potassium | 327 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 26% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.