Beef, chuck, shoulder clod, shoulder tender, medallion, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, grilled vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck, shoulder clod, shoulder tender, medallion, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, grilled
3 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
4 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck, shoulder clod, shoulder tender, medallion, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, grilled | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 181 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Beef, chuck, shoulder clod, shoulder tender, medallion, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, grilled has 18% more |
| Protein | 26.07 g ★ | 24.58 g | Beef, chuck, shoulder clod, shoulder tender, medallion, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, grilled has 6% more |
| Fat | 7.68 g | 5.28 g ★ | Beef, chuck, shoulder clod, shoulder tender, medallion, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, grilled has 45% more |
| Sodium | 60 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 33% more |
| Calcium | 5 mg | 8 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 38% more |
| Iron | 2.58 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Beef, chuck, shoulder clod, shoulder tender, medallion, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, grilled has 473% more |
| Potassium | 361 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 18% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.