Beef, chuck, shoulder clod, shoulder tender, medallion, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck, shoulder clod, shoulder tender, medallion, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw
3 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
4 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck, shoulder clod, shoulder tender, medallion, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 145 kcal ★ | 153 kcal | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 5% more |
| Protein | 20.51 g | 24.58 g ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 17% more |
| Fat | 6.36 g | 5.28 g ★ | Beef, chuck, shoulder clod, shoulder tender, medallion, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 20% more |
| Sodium | 59 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 34% more |
| Calcium | 5 mg | 8 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 38% more |
| Iron | 2.01 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Beef, chuck, shoulder clod, shoulder tender, medallion, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 347% more |
| Potassium | 339 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 23% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.