Beef, chuck, shoulder clod, shoulder top and center steaks, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck, shoulder clod, shoulder top and center steaks, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw
3 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
4 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck, shoulder clod, shoulder top and center steaks, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 141 kcal ★ | 153 kcal | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 8% more |
| Protein | 20.67 g | 24.58 g ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 16% more |
| Fat | 5.88 g | 5.28 g ★ | Beef, chuck, shoulder clod, shoulder top and center steaks, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw has 11% more |
| Sodium | 60 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 33% more |
| Calcium | 4 mg | 8 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 50% more |
| Iron | 2.31 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Beef, chuck, shoulder clod, shoulder top and center steaks, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw has 413% more |
| Potassium | 355 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 19% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.