Beef, chuck, shoulder clod, top blade, steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck, shoulder clod, top blade, steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw
2 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
5 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck, shoulder clod, top blade, steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 182 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Beef, chuck, shoulder clod, top blade, steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 19% more |
| Protein | 18.75 g | 24.58 g ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 24% more |
| Fat | 11.33 g | 5.28 g ★ | Beef, chuck, shoulder clod, top blade, steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 115% more |
| Sodium | 74 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 18% more |
| Calcium | 5 mg | 8 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 38% more |
| Iron | 2.23 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Beef, chuck, shoulder clod, top blade, steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 396% more |
| Potassium | 302 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 31% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.