Beef, chuck, shoulder clod, top blade, steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, grilled vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck, shoulder clod, top blade, steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, grilled
3 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
4 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck, shoulder clod, top blade, steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, grilled | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 212 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Beef, chuck, shoulder clod, top blade, steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, grilled has 39% more |
| Protein | 25.29 g ★ | 24.58 g | Beef, chuck, shoulder clod, top blade, steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, grilled has 3% more |
| Fat | 11.52 g | 5.28 g ★ | Beef, chuck, shoulder clod, top blade, steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, grilled has 118% more |
| Sodium | 76 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 16% more |
| Calcium | 6 mg | 8 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 25% more |
| Iron | 3.1 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Beef, chuck, shoulder clod, top blade, steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, grilled has 589% more |
| Potassium | 333 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 24% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.