Beef, chuck, shoulder clod, top blade, steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck, shoulder clod, top blade, steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw
2 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
5 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck, shoulder clod, top blade, steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 166 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Beef, chuck, shoulder clod, top blade, steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 8% more |
| Protein | 19.38 g | 24.58 g ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 21% more |
| Fat | 9.22 g | 5.28 g ★ | Beef, chuck, shoulder clod, top blade, steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 75% more |
| Sodium | 75 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 17% more |
| Calcium | 6 mg | 8 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 25% more |
| Iron | 2.62 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Beef, chuck, shoulder clod, top blade, steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 482% more |
| Potassium | 324 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 26% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.