Beef, chuck, top blade, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck, top blade, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled
3 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
4 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck, top blade, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 203 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Beef, chuck, top blade, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled has 33% more |
| Protein | 26.13 g ★ | 24.58 g | Beef, chuck, top blade, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled has 6% more |
| Fat | 10.16 g | 5.28 g ★ | Beef, chuck, top blade, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled has 92% more |
| Sodium | 68 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 24% more |
| Calcium | 7 mg | 8 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 13% more |
| Iron | 2.81 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Beef, chuck, top blade, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled has 524% more |
| Potassium | 304 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 31% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.