Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, braised vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, braised
4 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
3 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, braised | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 216 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, braised has 41% more |
| Protein | 30.68 g ★ | 24.58 g | Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, braised has 25% more |
| Fat | 9.44 g | 5.28 g ★ | Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, braised has 79% more |
| Sodium | 67 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 26% more |
| Calcium | 14 mg ★ | 8 mg | Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, braised has 75% more |
| Iron | 3.18 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, braised has 607% more |
| Potassium | 306 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 30% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.