Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast or steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast or steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw
3 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
4 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast or steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 187 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast or steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 22% more |
| Protein | 19.2 g | 24.58 g ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 22% more |
| Fat | 12.27 g | 5.28 g ★ | Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast or steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 132% more |
| Sodium | 77 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 14% more |
| Calcium | 12 mg ★ | 8 mg | Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast or steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 50% more |
| Iron | 2.27 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast or steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 404% more |
| Potassium | 347 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 21% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.