Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast or steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast or steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw
5 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
3 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast or steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 145 kcal ★ | 153 kcal | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 5% more |
| Protein | 21.19 g | 24.58 g ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 14% more |
| Carbs | 0.39 g ★ | 0 g | Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast or steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 0% more |
| Fat | 6.51 g | 5.28 g ★ | Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast or steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 23% more |
| Sodium | 80 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 11% more |
| Calcium | 12 mg ★ | 8 mg | Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast or steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 50% more |
| Iron | 2.27 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast or steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 404% more |
| Potassium | 361 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 18% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.