Beef, short loin, porterhouse steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, USDA select, cooked, broiled vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, short loin, porterhouse steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, USDA select, cooked, broiled
3 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
4 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, short loin, porterhouse steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, USDA select, cooked, broiled | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 267 kcal | 165 kcal ★ | Beef, short loin, porterhouse steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, USDA select, cooked, broiled has 62% more |
| Protein | 24.47 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 21% more |
| Fat | 17.98 g | 3.57 g ★ | Beef, short loin, porterhouse steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, USDA select, cooked, broiled has 404% more |
| Sodium | 65 mg ★ | 74 mg | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 12% more |
| Calcium | 7 mg | 15 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 53% more |
| Iron | 2.91 mg ★ | 1.04 mg | Beef, short loin, porterhouse steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, USDA select, cooked, broiled has 180% more |
| Potassium | 330 mg ★ | 256 mg | Beef, short loin, porterhouse steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, USDA select, cooked, broiled has 29% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.