Beef, short loin, porterhouse steak, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, broiled vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, short loin, porterhouse steak, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, broiled
3 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
4 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, short loin, porterhouse steak, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, broiled | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 194 kcal | 165 kcal ★ | Beef, short loin, porterhouse steak, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, broiled has 18% more |
| Protein | 26.89 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 13% more |
| Fat | 8.81 g | 3.57 g ★ | Beef, short loin, porterhouse steak, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, broiled has 147% more |
| Sodium | 69 mg ★ | 74 mg | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 7% more |
| Calcium | 6 mg | 15 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 60% more |
| Iron | 3.24 mg ★ | 1.04 mg | Beef, short loin, porterhouse steak, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, broiled has 212% more |
| Potassium | 367 mg ★ | 256 mg | Beef, short loin, porterhouse steak, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, broiled has 43% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.