Fish, wolffish, Atlantic, cooked, dry heat vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, wolffish, Atlantic, cooked, dry heat
3 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
7 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, wolffish, Atlantic, cooked, dry heat | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 123 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Fish, wolffish, Atlantic, cooked, dry heat has 3% more |
| Protein | 22.44 g ★ | 4.4 g | Fish, wolffish, Atlantic, cooked, dry heat has 410% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 3.06 g | 1.92 g ★ | Fish, wolffish, Atlantic, cooked, dry heat has 59% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 109 mg | 7 mg ★ | Fish, wolffish, Atlantic, cooked, dry heat has 1457% more |
| Calcium | 8 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 53% more |
| Iron | 0.12 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 92% more |
| Potassium | 385 mg ★ | 172 mg | Fish, wolffish, Atlantic, cooked, dry heat has 124% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.