Fish, wolffish, Atlantic, cooked, dry heat vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, wolffish, Atlantic, cooked, dry heat
2 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
9 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, wolffish, Atlantic, cooked, dry heat | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 123 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Fish, wolffish, Atlantic, cooked, dry heat has 37% more |
| Protein | 22.44 g ★ | 2.01 g | Fish, wolffish, Atlantic, cooked, dry heat has 1016% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 3.06 g | 0.15 g ★ | Fish, wolffish, Atlantic, cooked, dry heat has 1940% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 109 mg | 36 mg ★ | Fish, wolffish, Atlantic, cooked, dry heat has 203% more |
| Calcium | 8 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 79% more |
| Iron | 0.12 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 83% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 385 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 19% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.