Fish, wolffish, Atlantic, raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, wolffish, Atlantic, raw
4 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, wolffish, Atlantic, raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 96 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 20% more |
| Protein | 17.5 g ★ | 4.4 g | Fish, wolffish, Atlantic, raw has 298% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 2.39 g | 1.92 g ★ | Fish, wolffish, Atlantic, raw has 24% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 85 mg | 7 mg ★ | Fish, wolffish, Atlantic, raw has 1114% more |
| Calcium | 6 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 65% more |
| Iron | 0.09 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 94% more |
| Potassium | 300 mg ★ | 172 mg | Fish, wolffish, Atlantic, raw has 74% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.