Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, Enfamil 24, ready to feed, with ARA and DHA vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, Enfamil 24, ready to feed, with ARA and DHA
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
Nutrient Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, Enfamil 24, ready to feed, with ARA and DHA Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt Difference
Calories 71 kcal 90 kcal Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 21% more
Protein 1.64 g 2.01 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 18% more
Carbs 6.93 g 20.71 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 67% more
Fat 4.1 g 0.15 g Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, Enfamil 24, ready to feed, with ARA and DHA has 2633% more
Fiber 0 g 3.3 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Sugar 8.1 g 6.48 g Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, Enfamil 24, ready to feed, with ARA and DHA has 25% more
Sodium 21 mg 36 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 42% more
Calcium 61 mg 38 mg Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, Enfamil 24, ready to feed, with ARA and DHA has 61% more
Iron 1.41 mg 0.69 mg Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, Enfamil 24, ready to feed, with ARA and DHA has 104% more
Vitamin C 9.4 mg 19.6 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 52% more
Potassium 84 mg 475 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 82% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.