Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, Enfamil for Supplementing, powder, with ARA and DHA, not reconstituted vs Quinoa, cooked

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, Enfamil for Supplementing, powder, with ARA and DHA, not reconstituted
6 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
5 wins
Nutrient Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, Enfamil for Supplementing, powder, with ARA and DHA, not reconstituted Quinoa, cooked Difference
Calories 513 kcal 120 kcal Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, Enfamil for Supplementing, powder, with ARA and DHA, not reconstituted has 328% more
Protein 11.7 g 4.4 g Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, Enfamil for Supplementing, powder, with ARA and DHA, not reconstituted has 166% more
Carbs 55.8 g 21.3 g Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, Enfamil for Supplementing, powder, with ARA and DHA, not reconstituted has 162% more
Fat 27 g 1.92 g Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, Enfamil for Supplementing, powder, with ARA and DHA, not reconstituted has 1306% more
Fiber 0 g 2.8 g Quinoa, cooked has 100% more
Sugar 11.8 g 0.87 g Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, Enfamil for Supplementing, powder, with ARA and DHA, not reconstituted has 1256% more
Sodium 184 mg 7 mg Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, Enfamil for Supplementing, powder, with ARA and DHA, not reconstituted has 2529% more
Calcium 420 mg 17 mg Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, Enfamil for Supplementing, powder, with ARA and DHA, not reconstituted has 2371% more
Iron 9.2 mg 1.49 mg Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, Enfamil for Supplementing, powder, with ARA and DHA, not reconstituted has 517% more
Vitamin C 61 mg 0 mg Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, Enfamil for Supplementing, powder, with ARA and DHA, not reconstituted has 0% more
Potassium 550 mg 172 mg Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, Enfamil for Supplementing, powder, with ARA and DHA, not reconstituted has 220% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.