Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, Enfamil for Supplementing, ready to feed, with ARA and DHA vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, Enfamil for Supplementing, ready to feed, with ARA and DHA
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
Nutrient Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, Enfamil for Supplementing, ready to feed, with ARA and DHA Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt Difference
Calories 68 kcal 90 kcal Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 24% more
Protein 1.51 g 2.01 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 25% more
Carbs 7.6 g 20.71 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 63% more
Fat 3.5 g 0.15 g Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, Enfamil for Supplementing, ready to feed, with ARA and DHA has 2233% more
Fiber 0 g 3.3 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Sugar 1.93 g 6.48 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 70% more
Sodium 24 mg 36 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 33% more
Calcium 54 mg 38 mg Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, Enfamil for Supplementing, ready to feed, with ARA and DHA has 42% more
Iron 1.18 mg 0.69 mg Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, Enfamil for Supplementing, ready to feed, with ARA and DHA has 71% more
Vitamin C 7.9 mg 19.6 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 60% more
Potassium 71 mg 475 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 85% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.