Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, ENFAMIL, Infant, ready-to-feed, with ARA and DHA vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, ENFAMIL, Infant, ready-to-feed, with ARA and DHA
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
Nutrient Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, ENFAMIL, Infant, ready-to-feed, with ARA and DHA Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt Difference
Calories 68 kcal 90 kcal Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 24% more
Protein 1.31 g 2.01 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 35% more
Carbs 7.86 g 20.71 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 62% more
Fat 3.5 g 0.15 g Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, ENFAMIL, Infant, ready-to-feed, with ARA and DHA has 2233% more
Fiber 0 g 3.3 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Sugar 7 g 6.48 g Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, ENFAMIL, Infant, ready-to-feed, with ARA and DHA has 8% more
Sodium 18 mg 36 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 50% more
Calcium 51 mg 38 mg Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, ENFAMIL, Infant, ready-to-feed, with ARA and DHA has 34% more
Iron 1.18 mg 0.69 mg Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, ENFAMIL, Infant, ready-to-feed, with ARA and DHA has 71% more
Vitamin C 7.9 mg 19.6 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 60% more
Potassium 71 mg 475 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 85% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.