Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, ENFAMIL, LIPIL, low iron, liquid concentrate, with ARA and DHA vs Quinoa, cooked

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, ENFAMIL, LIPIL, low iron, liquid concentrate, with ARA and DHA
2 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
9 wins
Nutrient Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, ENFAMIL, LIPIL, low iron, liquid concentrate, with ARA and DHA Quinoa, cooked Difference
Calories 131 kcal 120 kcal Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, ENFAMIL, LIPIL, low iron, liquid concentrate, with ARA and DHA has 9% more
Protein 2.76 g 4.4 g Quinoa, cooked has 37% more
Carbs 14.24 g 21.3 g Quinoa, cooked has 33% more
Fat 7.16 g 1.92 g Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, ENFAMIL, LIPIL, low iron, liquid concentrate, with ARA and DHA has 273% more
Fiber 0 g 2.8 g Quinoa, cooked has 100% more
Sugar 14.24 g 0.87 g Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, ENFAMIL, LIPIL, low iron, liquid concentrate, with ARA and DHA has 1537% more
Sodium 39 mg 7 mg Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, ENFAMIL, LIPIL, low iron, liquid concentrate, with ARA and DHA has 457% more
Calcium 102 mg 17 mg Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, ENFAMIL, LIPIL, low iron, liquid concentrate, with ARA and DHA has 500% more
Iron 0.92 mg 1.49 mg Quinoa, cooked has 38% more
Vitamin C 15.8 mg 0 mg Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, ENFAMIL, LIPIL, low iron, liquid concentrate, with ARA and DHA has 0% more
Potassium 142 mg 172 mg Quinoa, cooked has 17% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.