Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, ENFAMIL, LIPIL, low iron, ready to feed, with ARA and DHA vs Quinoa, cooked

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, ENFAMIL, LIPIL, low iron, ready to feed, with ARA and DHA
3 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
8 wins
Nutrient Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, ENFAMIL, LIPIL, low iron, ready to feed, with ARA and DHA Quinoa, cooked Difference
Calories 64 kcal 120 kcal Quinoa, cooked has 47% more
Protein 1.38 g 4.4 g Quinoa, cooked has 69% more
Carbs 7.18 g 21.3 g Quinoa, cooked has 66% more
Fat 3.5 g 1.92 g Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, ENFAMIL, LIPIL, low iron, ready to feed, with ARA and DHA has 82% more
Fiber 0 g 2.8 g Quinoa, cooked has 100% more
Sugar 7.18 g 0.87 g Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, ENFAMIL, LIPIL, low iron, ready to feed, with ARA and DHA has 725% more
Sodium 18 mg 7 mg Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, ENFAMIL, LIPIL, low iron, ready to feed, with ARA and DHA has 157% more
Calcium 51 mg 17 mg Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, ENFAMIL, LIPIL, low iron, ready to feed, with ARA and DHA has 200% more
Iron 0.46 mg 1.49 mg Quinoa, cooked has 69% more
Vitamin C 7.9 mg 0 mg Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, ENFAMIL, LIPIL, low iron, ready to feed, with ARA and DHA has 0% more
Potassium 71 mg 172 mg Quinoa, cooked has 59% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.