Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, ENFAMIL, NUTRAMIGEN, with iron, ready-to-feed, with ARA and DHA vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, ENFAMIL, NUTRAMIGEN, with iron, ready-to-feed, with ARA and DHA
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
Nutrient Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, ENFAMIL, NUTRAMIGEN, with iron, ready-to-feed, with ARA and DHA Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt Difference
Calories 68 kcal 90 kcal Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 24% more
Protein 1.83 g 2.01 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 9% more
Carbs 7.21 g 20.71 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 65% more
Fat 3.5 g 0.15 g Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, ENFAMIL, NUTRAMIGEN, with iron, ready-to-feed, with ARA and DHA has 2233% more
Fiber 0 g 3.3 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Sugar 0.1 g 6.48 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 98% more
Sodium 31 mg 36 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 14% more
Calcium 62 mg 38 mg Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, ENFAMIL, NUTRAMIGEN, with iron, ready-to-feed, with ARA and DHA has 63% more
Iron 1.18 mg 0.69 mg Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, ENFAMIL, NUTRAMIGEN, with iron, ready-to-feed, with ARA and DHA has 71% more
Vitamin C 7.9 mg 19.6 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 60% more
Potassium 72 mg 475 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 85% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.