Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, PREGESTIMIL, with iron, with ARA and DHA, prepared from powder vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, PREGESTIMIL, with iron, with ARA and DHA, prepared from powder
4 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
7 wins
| Nutrient | Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, PREGESTIMIL, with iron, with ARA and DHA, prepared from powder | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 67 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 44% more |
| Protein | 1.86 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 58% more |
| Carbs | 6.54 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 69% more |
| Fat | 3.7 g | 1.92 g ★ | Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, PREGESTIMIL, with iron, with ARA and DHA, prepared from powder has 93% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0.53 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 39% more |
| Sodium | 31 mg | 7 mg ★ | Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, PREGESTIMIL, with iron, with ARA and DHA, prepared from powder has 343% more |
| Calcium | 62 mg ★ | 17 mg | Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, PREGESTIMIL, with iron, with ARA and DHA, prepared from powder has 265% more |
| Iron | 1.19 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 20% more |
| Vitamin C | 8 mg ★ | 0 mg | Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, PREGESTIMIL, with iron, with ARA and DHA, prepared from powder has 0% more |
| Potassium | 73 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 58% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.