Limes, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Limes, raw
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Limes, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 30 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 67% more |
| Protein | 0.7 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 65% more |
| Carbs | 10.54 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 49% more |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0.15 g ★ | Limes, raw has 33% more |
| Fiber | 2.8 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 15% more |
| Sugar | 1.69 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 74% more |
| Sodium | 2 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 94% more |
| Calcium | 33 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 13% more |
| Iron | 0.6 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 13% more |
| Vitamin C | 29.1 mg ★ | 19.6 mg | Limes, raw has 48% more |
| Potassium | 102 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 79% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.