Shortening, vegetable, household, composite vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Shortening, vegetable, household, composite
2 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
8 wins
| Nutrient | Shortening, vegetable, household, composite | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 884 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Shortening, vegetable, household, composite has 637% more |
| Protein | 0 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 99.97 g | 1.92 g ★ | Shortening, vegetable, household, composite has 5107% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 4 mg ★ | 7 mg | Quinoa, cooked has 43% more |
| Calcium | 1 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 94% more |
| Iron | 0.07 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 95% more |
| Potassium | 0 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.