SILK Hazelnut Creamer vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
SILK Hazelnut Creamer
1 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
10 wins
| Nutrient | SILK Hazelnut Creamer | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 133 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | SILK Hazelnut Creamer has 11% more |
| Protein | 0 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Carbs | 20 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 6% more |
| Fat | 6.67 g | 1.92 g ★ | SILK Hazelnut Creamer has 247% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 20 g | 0.87 g ★ | SILK Hazelnut Creamer has 2199% more |
| Sodium | 67 mg | 7 mg ★ | SILK Hazelnut Creamer has 857% more |
| Calcium | 0 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Iron | 0 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Vitamin C | 200 mg ★ | 0 mg | SILK Hazelnut Creamer has 0% more |
| Potassium | 0 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.