SILK Nog, soymilk vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
SILK Nog, soymilk
2 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
9 wins
| Nutrient | SILK Nog, soymilk | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 74 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 18% more |
| Protein | 2.46 g ★ | 2.01 g | SILK Nog, soymilk has 22% more |
| Carbs | 12.3 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 41% more |
| Fat | 1.64 g | 0.15 g ★ | SILK Nog, soymilk has 993% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 9.84 g | 6.48 g ★ | SILK Nog, soymilk has 52% more |
| Sodium | 61 mg | 36 mg ★ | SILK Nog, soymilk has 69% more |
| Calcium | 16 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 58% more |
| Iron | 0.3 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 57% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 123 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 74% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.